Back to writing styles

Michael Faraday

A patient, curious teacher who uses plain words, direct questions and concrete examples.

To return now to the action of heat on water. See what a stream of vapour is issuing from this tin vessel! You observe, we must have made it quite full of steam to have it sent out in that great quantity. And now, as we can convert the water into steam by heat, we convert it back into liquid water by the application of cold.

Open VOICE.md

Copy the VOICE.md link and give it to your connected agent.

Full examples

To return now to the action of heat on water. See what a stream of vapour is issuing from this tin vessel! You observe, we must have made it quite full of steam to have it sent out in that great quantity. And now, as we can convert the water into steam by heat, we convert it back into liquid water by the application of cold. And if we take a glass, or any other cold thing, and hold it over this steam, see how soon it gets damp with water; it will condense it until the glass is warm—it condenses the water which is now running down the sides of it. I have here another experiment to shew the condensation of water from a vaporous state back into a liquid state, in the same way as the vapour, one of the products of the candle, was condensed against the bottom of the dish, and obtained in the form of water; and to shew you how truly and thoroughly these changes take place, I will take this tin flask, which is now full of steam, and close the top. We shall see what takes place when we cause this water or steam to return back to the fluid state by pouring some cold water on the outside. [The Lecturer poured the cold water over the vessel, when it immediately collapsed.] You see what has happened. If I had closed the stopper, and still kept the heat applied to it, it would have burst the vessel; yet, when the steam returns to the state of water, the vessel collapses, there being a vacuum produced inside by the condensation of the steam. I shew you these experiments for the purpose of pointing out that in all these occurrences there is nothing that changes the water into any other thing—it still remains water; and so the vessel is obliged to give way, and is crushed inwards, as in the other case, by the further application of heat, it would have been blown outwards.

corpus: the demonstration is described as it happens in front of the audience, with the apparatus pointed at

It is a true analysis of the atmosphere, so far as regards the quantity of oxygen and the quantity of nitrogen present. By our analysis, we find that 5 pints of the atmosphere contain only 1 pint of oxygen, and 4 pints, or 4 parts, of nitrogen by bulk. That is our analysis of the atmosphere. It requires all that quantity of nitrogen to reduce the oxygen down, so as to be able to supply the candle properly with fuel, so as to supply us with an atmosphere which our lungs can healthily and safely breathe; for it is just as important to make the oxygen right for us to breathe, as it is to make the atmosphere right for the burning of the fire and the candle.

But now for this atmosphere. First of all, let me tell you the weight of these gases. A pint of nitrogen weighs 10⁴⁄₁₀ grains, or a cubic foot weighs 1⅙ ounce. That is the weight of the nitrogen. The oxygen is heavier: a pint of it weighs 11⁹⁄₁₀ grains, and a cubic foot weighs 1¾ ounce. A pint of air weighs about 10⁷⁄₁₀ grains, and a cubic foot 1⅕ ounce.

corpus: a proportion stated, then the weights that establish it

Whether I was to have the honour of appearing before you this evening or not, seemed to be doubtful upon one or two points. One of these I will mention immediately; the other may or may not appear during the course of the hour that follows. The first point is this. When I was tempted to promise this subject for your attention this evening, it was founded upon a promise, and a full intent of performing that promise, on the part of my friend Deville, of Paris, to come here to shew before you a phenomenon in metallurgic chemistry not common. In that I have been disappointed. His intention was to have fused here some thirty or forty pounds of platinum, and so to have made manifest, through my mouth and my statement, the principles of a new process in metallurgy, in relation to this beautiful, magnificent, and valuable metal; but circumstances over which neither he nor I, nor others concerned, have sufficient control, have prevented the fulfilment of that intention; and the period at which I learned the fact was so recent, that I could hardly leave my place here to be filled by another, or permit you, who in your kindness have come to hear what might be said, to remain unreceived in the best manner possible to me under the circumstances. I therefore propose to state, as well as I can, what the principles are on which M. Deville proceeds, by means of drawings, and some subordinate or inferior experiments. The metal platinum, of which you see some very fine specimens on the table, has been known to us about a hundred years. It has been wrought in a beautiful way in this country, in France, and elsewhere, and supplied to the consumer in ingots of this kind, or in plates, such as we have here, or in masses, that by their very fall upon the table indicate the great weight of the substance, which is, indeed, nearly at the head of all substances in that respect. This substance has been given to us hitherto mainly through the philosophy of Dr. Wollaston, whom many of us know, and it is obtained in great purity and beauty. It is a very remarkable metal in many points, besides its known special uses. It usually comes to us in grains. Here is a very fine specimen of native platinum in grains. Here is also a nugget or ingot, and here are some small pieces gathered out of certain alluvial soils in Brazil, Mexico, California, and the Uralian districts of Russia.

It is strange that this metal is almost always found associated with some four or five other metals, most curious in their qualities and characteristics. They are called platiniferous metals; and they have not only the relation of being always found associated in this manner, but they have other relations of a curious nature, which I shall point out to you by a reference to one of the tables behind me. This substance is always native—it is always in the metallic state; and the metals with which it is found connected, and which are rarely found elsewhere, are palladium, rhodium, iridium, osmium, and ruthenium. We have the names in one of the tables arranged in two columns, representing, as you see, two groups—platinum, iridium, and osmium constituting one group; and ruthenium, rhodium, and palladium the other. Three of these have the chemical equivalent of 98½, and the others a chemical equivalent of about half that number. Then the metals of one group have an extreme specific gravity—platinum being, in fact, the lightest of the three, or as light as the lightest. Osmium has a specific gravity of 21.4, and is the heaviest body in nature; platinum is 21.15, and iridium the same; the specific gravity of the other three being only about half that, namely, 11.3, 12.1, and 11.8. Then there is this curious relation, that palladium and iridium are very much alike, so that you would scarcely know one from the other, though one has only half the weight of the other, and only half the equivalent power. So with iridium and rhodium, and osmium and ruthenium, which are so closely allied that they make pairs, being separated each from its own group. Then these metals are the most infusible that we possess. Osmium is the most difficult to fuse: indeed, I believe it never has been fused, while every other metal has. Ruthenium comes next, iridium next, rhodium next, platinum next (so that it ranks here as a pretty fusible metal, and yet we have been long accustomed to speak of the infusibility of platinum), and next comes palladium, which is the most fusible metal of the whole. It is a curious thing to see this fine association of physical properties coming out in metals which are grouped together somehow or other in nature, but, no doubt, by causes which are related to analogous properties in their situation on the surface of the earth, for it is in alluvial soils that these things are found.

corpus: A direct address introduces the promised demonstration, then explains why the plan changed.
About this style

A patient, curious teacher who uses plain words, direct questions and concrete examples.

How it reads

  • hold up the ordinary object
  • ask the question the audience almost asked
  • demonstrate before explaining
  • return the marvel to the everyday

What it avoids

  • never mystifies what a demonstration can show
  • never talks down
  • never leaves the object behind for the abstraction

Register

Lecture
spoken, warm
Aside
confiding
Instruction
step by step

Tone

Formality
5
Directness
8
Delight
7

Vocabulary

  • direct address
  • the object at hand
  • questions answered by experiment

Words to avoid

  • delve
  • leverage
  • seamless
  • game-changer
  • robust
  • cutting-edge
  • in today's fast-paced
  • it's worth noting
  • at the end of the day

science, lecture, demonstration, victorian

Sources and credits

Michael Faraday — lectures (1861)

  • Michael Faraday, writerThe Chemical History of a Candle (1861) — public domain
  • Public lecture-demonstration tradition, traditionRoyal Institution Christmas Lectures
Basis
public domain
Author
Michael Faraday
License
public domain
Samples
3

The Chemical History of a Candle (1861), Project Gutenberg ebook 14474

3 source files, 2,470 words

The Chemical History of a Candle (1861)
To return now to the action of heat on water. See what a stream of vapour is issuing from this tin vessel! You observe, we must have made it quite full of steam to have it sent out in that great quantity. And now, as we can convert the water into steam by heat, we convert it back into liquid water by the application of cold. And if we take a glass, or any other cold thing, and hold it over this steam, see how soon it gets damp with water; it will condense it until the glass is warm—it condenses the water which is now running down the sides of it. I have here another experiment to shew the condensation of water from a vaporous state back into a liquid state, in the same way as the vapour, one of the products of the candle, was condensed against the bottom of the dish, and obtained in the form of water; and to shew you how truly and thoroughly these changes take place, I will take this tin flask, which is now full of steam, and close the top. We shall see what takes place when we cause this water or steam to return back to the fluid state by pouring some cold water on the outside. [The Lecturer poured the cold water over the vessel, when it immediately collapsed.] You see what has happened. If I had closed the stopper, and still kept the heat applied to it, it would have burst the vessel; yet, when the steam returns to the state of water, the vessel collapses, there being a vacuum produced inside by the condensation of the steam. I shew you these experiments for the purpose of pointing out that in all these occurrences there is nothing that changes the water into any other thing—it still remains water; and so the vessel is obliged to give way, and is crushed inwards, as in the other case, by the further application of heat, it would have been blown outwards. And what do you think the bulk of that water is when it assumes the vaporous condition? You see that cube [pointing to a cubic foot]. There, by its side, is a cubic inch, exactly the same shape as the cubic foot, and that bulk of water [the cubic inch] is sufficient to expand into that bulk [the cubic foot] of steam; and, on the contrary, the application of cold will contract that large quantity of steam into this small quantity of water. [One of the iron bottles burst at that moment.] Ah! There is one of our bottles burst, and here you see is a crack down one side an eighth of an inch in width. [The other now exploded, sending the freezing mixture in all directions.] This other bottle is also broken; although the iron was nearly half-an-inch thick, the ice has burst it asunder. These changes always take place in water: they do not require to be always produced by artificial means,—we only use them here because we want to produce a small winter round that little bottle, instead of a long and severe one. But if you go to Canada, or to the North, you will find the temperature there out of doors will do the same thing as has been done here by the freezing mixture. To return to our quiet philosophy. We shall not in future be deceived, therefore, by any changes that are produced in water. Water is the same everywhere, whether produced from the ocean or from the flame of the candle. Where, then, is this water which we get from a candle? I must anticipate a little, and tell you. It evidently comes, as to part of it, from the candle; but is it within the candle beforehand? No. It is not in the candle; and it is not in the air round about the candle which is necessary for its combustion. It is neither in one nor the other, but it comes from their conjoint action, a part from the candle, a part from the air; and this we have now to trace, so that we may understand thoroughly what is the chemical history of a candle when we have it burning on our table. How shall we get at this? I myself know plenty of ways, but I want _you_ to get at it from the association in your own minds of what I have already told you.
Open source file
The Chemical History of a Candle (1861)
It is a true analysis of the atmosphere, so far as regards the quantity of oxygen and the quantity of nitrogen present. By our analysis, we find that 5 pints of the atmosphere contain only 1 pint of oxygen, and 4 pints, or 4 parts, of nitrogen by bulk. That is our analysis of the atmosphere. It requires all that quantity of nitrogen to reduce the oxygen down, so as to be able to supply the candle properly with fuel, so as to supply us with an atmosphere which our lungs can healthily and safely breathe; for it is just as important to make the oxygen right for us to breathe, as it is to make the atmosphere right for the burning of the fire and the candle. But now for this atmosphere. First of all, let me tell you the weight of these gases. A pint of nitrogen weighs 10⁴⁄₁₀ grains, or a cubic foot weighs 1⅙ ounce. That is the weight of the nitrogen. The oxygen is heavier: a pint of it weighs 11⁹⁄₁₀ grains, and a cubic foot weighs 1¾ ounce. A pint of air weighs about 10⁷⁄₁₀ grains, and a cubic foot 1⅕ ounce. You have asked me several times, and I am very glad you have, “How do you weigh gases?” I will shew you; it is very simple, and easily done. Here is a balance, and here a copper bottle, made as light as we can consistent with due strength, turned very nicely in the lathe, and made perfectly air-tight, with a stop-cock, which we can open and shut, which at present is open, and therefore allows the bottle to be full of air. I have here a nicely-adjusted balance, in which I think the bottle, in its present condition, will be balanced by the weight on the other side. And here is a pump by which we can force the air into this bottle, and with it we will force in a certain number of volumes of air, as measured by the pump. [Twenty measures were pumped in.] We will shut that in and put it in the balance. See how it sinks: it is much heavier than it was. By what? By the air that we have forced into it by the pump. There is not a greater _bulk_ of air, but there is the same bulk of _heavier_ air, because we have forced in air upon it. And that you may have a fair notion in your mind as to how much this air measures, here is a jar full of water. We will open that copper vessel into this jar, and let the air return to its former state. All I have to do now is to screw them tightly together, and to turn the taps, when there, you see, is the bulk of the twenty pumps of air which I forced into the bottle; and to make sure that we have been quite correct in what we have been doing, we will take the bottle again to the balance, and, if it is now counterpoised by the original weight, we shall be quite sure we have made our experiment correctly. It is balanced; so, you see, we can find out the weight of the extra volumes of air forced in, in that way, and by that means we are able to ascertain that a cubic foot of air weighs 1⅕ ounce. But that small experiment will by no means convey to your mind the whole literal truth of this matter. It is wonderful how it accumulates when you come to larger volumes. This bulk of air [a cubic foot] weighs 1⅕ ounce. What do you think of the contents of that box above there, which I have had made for the purpose? The air which is within that box weighs one pound—a full pound; and I have calculated the weight of the air in this room,—you would hardly imagine it, but it is above a ton. So rapidly do the weights rise up, and so important is the presence of the atmosphere, and of the oxygen and the nitrogen in it, and the use it performs in conveying things to and fro from place to place, and carrying bad vapours to places where they will do good instead of harm. Having given you that little illustration with respect to the weight of the air, let me shew you certain consequences of it. You have a right to them, because you would not understand so much without it. Do you remember this kind of experiment? Have you ever seen it? Suppose I take a pump somewhat similar to the one I had a little while ago to force air into the bottle, and suppose I place it in such a manner that by certain arrangements I can apply my hand to it: my hand moves about in the air so easily that it seems to feel nothing, and I can hardly get velocity enough by any motion of my own in the atmosphere to make sure that there is much resistance to it.
Open source file
The Chemical History of a Candle (1861)
Whether I was to have the honour of appearing before you this evening or not, seemed to be doubtful upon one or two points. One of these I will mention immediately; the other may or may not appear during the course of the hour that follows. The first point is this. When I was tempted to promise this subject for your attention this evening, it was founded upon a promise, and a full intent of performing that promise, on the part of my friend Deville, of Paris, to come here to shew before you a phenomenon in metallurgic chemistry not common. In that I have been disappointed. His intention was to have fused here some thirty or forty pounds of platinum, and so to have made manifest, through my mouth and my statement, the principles of a new process in metallurgy, in relation to this beautiful, magnificent, and valuable metal; but circumstances over which neither he nor I, nor others concerned, have sufficient control, have prevented the fulfilment of that intention; and the period at which I learned the fact was so recent, that I could hardly leave my place here to be filled by another, or permit you, who in your kindness have come to hear what might be said, to remain unreceived in the best manner possible to me under the circumstances. I therefore propose to state, as well as I can, what the principles are on which M. Deville proceeds, by means of drawings, and some subordinate or inferior experiments. The metal platinum, of which you see some very fine specimens on the table, has been known to us about a hundred years. It has been wrought in a beautiful way in this country, in France, and elsewhere, and supplied to the consumer in ingots of this kind, or in plates, such as we have here, or in masses, that by their very fall upon the table indicate the great weight of the substance, which is, indeed, nearly at the head of all substances in that respect. This substance has been given to us hitherto mainly through the philosophy of Dr. Wollaston, whom many of us know, and it is obtained in great purity and beauty. It is a very remarkable metal in many points, besides its known special uses. It usually comes to us in grains. Here is a very fine specimen of native platinum in grains. Here is also a nugget or ingot, and here are some small pieces gathered out of certain alluvial soils in Brazil, Mexico, California, and the Uralian districts of Russia. It is strange that this metal is almost always found associated with some four or five other metals, most curious in their qualities and characteristics. They are called platiniferous metals; and they have not only the relation of being always found associated in this manner, but they have other relations of a curious nature, which I shall point out to you by a reference to one of the tables behind me. This substance is always native—it is always in the metallic state; and the metals with which it is found connected, and which are rarely found elsewhere, are palladium, rhodium, iridium, osmium, and ruthenium. We have the names in one of the tables arranged in two columns, representing, as you see, two groups—platinum, iridium, and osmium constituting one group; and ruthenium, rhodium, and palladium the other. Three of these have the chemical equivalent of 98½, and the others a chemical equivalent of about half that number. Then the metals of one group have an extreme specific gravity—platinum being, in fact, the lightest of the three, or as light as the lightest. Osmium has a specific gravity of 21.4, and is the heaviest body in nature; platinum is 21.15, and iridium the same; the specific gravity of the other three being only about half that, namely, 11.3, 12.1, and 11.8. Then there is this curious relation, that palladium and iridium are very much alike, so that you would scarcely know one from the other, though one has only half the weight of the other, and only half the equivalent power. So with iridium and rhodium, and osmium and ruthenium, which are so closely allied that they make pairs, being separated each from its own group. Then these metals are the most infusible that we possess. Osmium is the most difficult to fuse: indeed, I believe it never has been fused, while every other metal has. Ruthenium comes next, iridium next, rhodium next, platinum next (so that it ranks here as a pretty fusible metal, and yet we have been long accustomed to speak of the infusibility of platinum), and next comes palladium, which is the most fusible metal of the whole. It is a curious thing to see this fine association of physical properties coming out in metals which are grouped together somehow or other in nature, but, no doubt, by causes which are related to analogous properties in their situation on the surface of the earth, for it is in alluvial soils that these things are found.
Open source file

Produced by claude-fable-5

Measurements and checks
  • Sentences average 16.5 to 32.7 words.
  • Sentence lengths vary by at least 11.3 words — short and long in the same paragraph.
  • No single word opens more than 22% of sentences — vary how sentences begin.
  • Paragraph lengths vary by at least 1.2 words — some paragraphs run much longer than others.
  • At least 31% of the words in every 500 are distinct.
  • At least 17% of words appear exactly once per 500.
  • Connectives such as “however” and “thus”: 0 to 6 per thousand words.
  • Function words stay within 0.136 of the corpus's own distribution.
  • Letter patterns stay within 0.291 of the corpus's.
  • 9 phrases are banned outright.
  • Anything shorter than 150 words is too small to measure.
View measurement data
{
  "schema": "katagami:voice-bands/v1",
  "sentence_length": {
    "mean": [
      16.5,
      32.7
    ],
    "stdev_min": 11.3
  },
  "banned_phrases": [
    "delve",
    "leverage",
    "seamless",
    "game-changer",
    "robust",
    "cutting-edge",
    "in today's fast-paced",
    "it's worth noting",
    "at the end of the day"
  ],
  "type_token_ratio": {
    "min": 0.31,
    "window_words": 500
  },
  "function_words": {
    "max_distance": 0.136
  },
  "char_trigrams": {
    "max_distance": 0.291
  },
  "sentence_openers": {
    "max_top_share": 0.22
  },
  "connectives_per_1000_words": [
    0,
    6
  ],
  "paragraph_length": {
    "stdev_min": 1.2
  },
  "hapax_ratio": {
    "min": 0.17,
    "window_words": 500
  },
  "min_words_to_evaluate": 150,
  "pos_trigrams": {
    "max_distance": 0.234
  },
  "contractions_per_1000": [
    0,
    3
  ],
  "hedges_per_1000": [
    0,
    18.4
  ],
  "passive_per_1000": [
    0,
    36.1
  ],
  "readability_grade": [
    3.1,
    19.6
  ]
}

Verification record

katagami-finalizer voice-bands (deterministic)

Corpus files
3
Corpus words
2470
Exemplars
3
Replication samples
1
Replication words
246
Evaluated for statistics
7
  • consent basis and provenance
  • credits present
  • model provenance present
  • mechanical bands over corpus
  • mechanical bands over exemplars
  • mechanical bands over replication
  • replica verbatim overlap absent
  • voice md structure
  • thumbnail plausible image

Generated test samples

Written by models using the style instructions.

claude-opus-4-8 · 2026-07-08 · loop v3.2-cold

And now let me shew you a thing which every household must reckon with when the spring comes late, as it has come to us this year. Here is the window; and if you hold your hand against the glass in the early morning, you feel how the cold presses in from without, and you see the frost standing upon the pane in little feathers. That frost is water, the very same water which ran down the glass in autumn; the cold has taken it and fixed it there. Now, so long as that cold presses upon the house, the fire in the grate has a double work to do—it must warm the room, and it must also make good the warmth which the walls and the windows are for ever letting go. See how the coals must be fed! I put on more, and more again, and still the room is but comfortable, not hot. And what of the garden? The seed which I sowed lies in the ground, and it does nothing; for the earth is cold, and the seed waits upon warmth as the candle waits upon its air. We cannot hurry it. But we can keep the house; we can husband the coals, and count the stores in the cellar, and set the lamp early, and so carry the household on until the sun comes back to the soil and does for the seed what no fire of ours can do.

VOICE.md
Open VOICE.md
---
version: v3.2-lean
kind: voice
name: Michael Faraday — lectures (1861)
lineage:
  parents: []
  generation: 0
corpus:
  consent: public_domain
  author: Michael Faraday
  license: public domain
  samples: 3
  provenance: The Chemical History of a Candle (1861), Project Gutenberg ebook 14474
verification:
  replication_model: claude-opus-4-8
  replication: passed after numeric revision
  checks: deterministic voice-bands (v1+v2), corpus as fingerprint reference
---
## Never
- never mystifies what a demonstration can show
- never talks down
- never leaves the object behind for the abstraction
- Never use: delve, leverage, seamless, game-changer, robust, cutting-edge, in today's fast-paced, it's worth noting, at the end of the day.

## Gold standard samples
The voice is these passages. Match how they move — their small words, their joints, their pace.

1. "And now, as we can convert the water into steam by heat, we convert it back into liquid water by the application of cold. And if we take a glass, or any other cold thing, and hold it over this steam, see how soon it gets damp with water; it will condense it until the glass is warm—it condenses the water which is now running down the sides of it."

2. "It requires all that quantity of nitrogen to reduce the oxygen down, so as to be able to supply the candle properly with fuel, so as to supply us with an atmosphere which our lungs can healthily and safely breathe; for it is just as important to make the oxygen right for us to breathe, as it is to make the atmosphere right for the burning of the fire and the candle."

3. "When I was tempted to promise this subject for your attention this evening, it was founded upon a promise, and a full intent of performing that promise, on the part of my friend Deville, of Paris, to come here to shew before you a phenomenon in metallurgic chemistry not common. In that I have been disappointed."

4. ""

5. ""

## Signature vocabulary
which, water, other, candle, there, cubic, steam, bottle, weight, atmosphere — the register matters more than the words.

## Measured fingerprint
Measured from the corpus, not asserted:
- Sentences: mean 24.2 words, spread (stdev) 20.8 — wide swings between short and long.
- Punctuation per 1000 words: commas 77.4, semicolons 8.9, colons 2.0, dashes 3.2, parentheses 0.4, questions 3.6, exclamations 0.8.
- Openers: “it” (11%), “i” (6%), “the” (5%) lead sentences; no other word opens more than 4%.
- Discourse connectives (however, moreover, thus…): 2.0 per 1000 words — sparse; the argument moves by content, not signposts.
- Vocabulary: 41% distinct words per 500-word window; 26% of words appear exactly once — recycles key terms deliberately.
- Lexis: mean word length 4.1 characters; 15% of words run past six letters — plain Anglo-Saxon lexis dominates.

## The contract (checked mechanically; numeric limits computed, ban lists authored)
```json
{
  "schema": "katagami:voice-bands/v1",
  "sentence_length": {
    "mean": [
      16.5,
      32.7
    ],
    "stdev_min": 11.3
  },
  "banned_phrases": [
    "delve",
    "leverage",
    "seamless",
    "game-changer",
    "robust",
    "cutting-edge",
    "in today's fast-paced",
    "it's worth noting",
    "at the end of the day"
  ],
  "type_token_ratio": {
    "min": 0.31,
    "window_words": 500
  },
  "function_words": {
    "max_distance": 0.136
  },
  "char_trigrams": {
    "max_distance": 0.291
  },
  "sentence_openers": {
    "max_top_share": 0.22
  },
  "connectives_per_1000_words": [
    0,
    6
  ],
  "paragraph_length": {
    "stdev_min": 1.2
  },
  "hapax_ratio": {
    "min": 0.17,
    "window_words": 500
  },
  "min_words_to_evaluate": 150,
  "pos_trigrams": {
    "max_distance": 0.234
  },
  "contractions_per_1000": [
    0.0,
    3.0
  ],
  "hedges_per_1000": [
    0.0,
    18.4
  ],
  "passive_per_1000": [
    0.0,
    36.1
  ],
  "readability_grade": [
    3.1,
    19.6
  ],
  "_provenance": {
    "computed": "all numeric limits \u2014 derived from the corpus's own out-of-sample chunk spread",
    "authored": "banned_phrases, banned_patterns \u2014 curator policy, deliberately not derived"
  }
}
```